Comments on: Cognition – The Super Simple Series! | Part 3: Cognition Steps and the Anatomy of the Cognition Process https://alittlebitofpersonality.com/cognition-super-simple-part-3/ a celebration of people with your adorable host, an ENTP... and her INFJ Sun, 03 Nov 2019 18:54:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: Ian https://alittlebitofpersonality.com/cognition-super-simple-part-3/#comment-2008 Sun, 03 Nov 2019 18:54:20 +0000 http://www.alittlebitofpersonality.com/cognition-the-super-simple-series-part-3-cognition-steps-and-the-anatomy-of-the-cognition-process/#comment-2008 In reply to Khendrin.

It actually does make sense. All it is is a preference in the second and third slot either for actions vs information or specifics vs universals.

IJs prefer specifics in the second and third slot to make universals
EJs prefer universals in the second and third slot to make specifics
IPs prefer action in the second and third slot to get information
EPs prefer information in the second and third to take actions

I just simplified it a little. Once you put the details in place you get a better picture. Take what I said and use it with reference to each types first step. It makes sense from there

]]> By: Khendrin https://alittlebitofpersonality.com/cognition-super-simple-part-3/#comment-1751 Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:21:28 +0000 http://www.alittlebitofpersonality.com/cognition-the-super-simple-series-part-3-cognition-steps-and-the-anatomy-of-the-cognition-process/#comment-1751 Greetings!

I discovered your website sometimes ago and I’m still fascinated by your great work. It is quite a fresh air in all Jungians typologies theories. And thank you to be who you are because it is quite funny to read and learn from you.

There’s only a little thing I just can’t understand (and I’m sorry to bother you with this):
IJ = Principles (Intro, J, Uni, Info) -> Action (Extra, J, Spe, Act) -> Data (Intro, P, Spe, Info) -> Observation (Extra, P, Uni, Act)
EJ = Action (Extra, J, Spe, Act) -> Principles (Intro, J, Uni, Info) -> Observation (Extra, P, Uni, Act) -> Data (Intro, P, Spe, Info)
That, okay, I understand. Your model your rules. But I don’t understand why suddenly there is a hiccup changing it all the way for the Ps.

What is wrong with this:
IP = Data (Intro, P, Spe, Info) -> Observation (Extra, P, Uni, Act) -> Principles (Intro, J, Uni, Info) -> Action (Extra, J, Spe, Act)
EP = Observation (Extra, P, Uni, Act) -> Data (Intro, P, Spe, Info) -> Action (Extra, J, Spe, Act) -> Principles (Intro, J, Uni, Info)

Sorry to bother you with this. I’m just trying to understand fully your point of view.

]]> By: Idec Sdawkminn https://alittlebitofpersonality.com/cognition-super-simple-part-3/#comment-36 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 05:42:51 +0000 http://www.alittlebitofpersonality.com/cognition-the-super-simple-series-part-3-cognition-steps-and-the-anatomy-of-the-cognition-process/#comment-36 Just re-reading this again because of the great shout-outs about it in the podcasts. It’s like I’m reading it for the first time and everything is making so much more sense now. I even saw the Universal/Specific sandwich pattern when you first outlined the Judging half step order and it made the order make more sense why it would go that way. And then you went into explaining it right after that and I thought it was cool I noticed it before it was explained. The first time I read it, it was hard to understand everything even after it was explained and even after I re-read it multiple times. This time it was like I saw where it was going ahead of time. Anyway, just wanted to pat myself on the back, but I wouldn’t be able to do that if these posts weren’t so great.

]]> By: Cat https://alittlebitofpersonality.com/cognition-super-simple-part-3/#comment-10 Wed, 18 Jan 2017 21:47:55 +0000 http://www.alittlebitofpersonality.com/cognition-the-super-simple-series-part-3-cognition-steps-and-the-anatomy-of-the-cognition-process/#comment-10 It is so cool how everything comes together! 😀 I love the Perceiver Toolbox and the Judger Map… they really help me to visualize how it all works.

]]>